Using Crossword Puzzle to Increase Students’ Vocabulary Mastery in Junior High School

Surtiyem Surtiyem; Lusi Nurhayati; Yuyun Yulia

doi:10.58905/jse.v6i2.766

Authors

Surtiyem Surtiyem Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Lusi Nurhayati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Yuyun Yulia Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i2.766

Keywords:

Active learning, Classroom action research, Crossword puzzle, English vocabulary mastery, Game based learning

Abstract

This study aims to improve students’ vocabulary mastery through the use of crossword puzzles in a classroom action research setting conducted in two cycles. The participants were 25 seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 2 Karau Kuala, whose initial vocabulary proficiency was identified as low based on the pre-test, with the majority scoring within the fair and poor categories. The intervention involved implementing crossword puzzles as a learning medium designed to enhance students’ engagement, motivation, and retention of vocabulary through active learning strategies. Data were collected through pre-tests, formative tests, post-tests, questionnaires, observations, and field notes. The results of Cycle 1 showed a moderate improvement, with students beginning to demonstrate higher levels of participation and vocabulary recall, although some still struggled with understanding instructions. After revising the lesson plan and improving instructional clarity in Cycle 2, students’ vocabulary mastery increased significantly, as evidenced by the rise in students who achieved ratings of 3 and 4 and the absence of students in the lowest category. Qualitative findings also revealed enhanced confidence, reduced learning anxiety, and more collaborative classroom interactions during the learning process. Overall, the study concludes that crossword puzzles are an effective and engaging medium for improving vocabulary mastery among junior high school students. These findings suggest the need for further exploration of digital crossword tools, long-term retention effects, and the application of similar strategies to other language competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. N. Ardiansah and K. Hikmah, “Interactive Arabic Vocabulary Learning Through Crossword Puzzles in Elementary School: Pembelajaran Kosakata Arab Interaktif Melalui Teka-teki Silang di Sekolah Dasar,” Journal of Islamic and Muhammadiyah Studies, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 10.21070/jims.v7i2.1634-10.21070/jims.v7i2.1634, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.21070/jims.v7i2.1634.

Z. Filina, “Efektifitas Metode Role Playing Untuk Meningkatkan Kosakata Anak Tunarungu,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Khusus, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 311–318, 2013.

N. Juniarti, S. Ulfiyani, and L. A. Kurniawan, “Alih Kode dan Campur Kode Dialog Sepekan Sinetron Kebangsaan TVRI Jawa Tengah,” JURNAL-ISTRENDi : JURNAL LINGUISTIK, SASTRA, DAN PENDIDIKAN, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2024, doi: 10.51673/jurnalistrendi.v9i1.2009.

H. Rahayu, K. Rangkuti, N. U. Manurung, E. P. Wuriyani, and K. Anshari, “PERBEDAAN PEMAKNAAN KATA DALAM KONTEKS SEMANTIK DAN PRAGMATIK DALAM BERBAHASA DI LINGKUNGAN SEKOLAH PADA SISWA KELAS 5 DI SDN 064990,” Jurnal Sains Student Research, vol. 3, no. 2, 2025.

P. Thompson and D. Bertaux, Between Generations: Family Models, Myths and Memories. USA: Routledge, 2020.

A. A. A’raf, S. Tahmir, and A. Rahman, “Keefektifan Penerapan Model Pem-belajaran Kooperatif Dengan Pendekatan Scientific Dalam Pembelajaran Ma-tematika Di Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Majene,” Jurnal Daya Matematis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2015.

Z. Abidin, Intuisi Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Lentera Ilmu Cendekia, 2015.

M. O. Fauzan and W. Yulianti, “Motivasi Belajar untuk Membentuk Sum-berdaya Manusia Unggul pada Era Milenial,” Jurnal Abdidas, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 590–598, 2022, doi: 10.31004/abdidas.v3i3.628.

S. Abdullah, R. Fauzi, and I. Setiawan, “Optimalisasi Desain Iklan Produk Dengan Canva Untuk Pemasaran Digital,” JIPM: Jurnal Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2025, doi: 10.55903/jipm.v3i1.214.

R. Hu, Y. Y. Wu, and C. J. Shieh, “Effects of virtual reality integrated creative thinking instruction on students’ creative thinking abilities,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 477–486, 2016, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2016.1226a.

A. Alvinaria, A. Lukito, and P. Wijayanti, “Identifikasi Berpikir Aljabar Siswa Field Independent dan Field Dependent Menggunakan Taksonomi SOLO,” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 142–165, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.26740/jrpipm.v5n2.p142-165.

A. Alam and K. Khotimah, “Peningkatan Penguasaan Kosa Kata Bahasa Arab Melalui Game Arabic Treasure Hunter,” pba, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 58–77, June 2021, doi: 10.35719/pba.v1i1.9.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. America: SAGE Publications, 2016.

R. O. Capalit, Ann and E. A. Carlos, “The effects of Deaf Entrepreneurship Program ( DEP ) on the Personal Entrepreneurial Competencies ( PECs ) of se-lected ANHS Deaf students,” International Journal of Research Publications, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 105–116, 2021.

P. V. Carrión, C. S. González-González, S. Aciar, and G. Rodríguez-Morales, “Methodology for systematic literature review applied to engineering and ed-ucation,” in 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Spain: IEEE, Apr. 2018, pp. 1364–1373. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363388.

S. Paramita et al., “Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Lokasi Wisata Air Panas Asin Pemapak di Biatan Bapinang, Biatan, Berau, Kalimantan Timur,” Jurnal Abdita Naturafarm, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 31–37, 2024, doi: 10.70392/jan.v1i2.3137.

I. Lenaini, “Teknik Pengambilan Sampel Purposive dan Snowball Sampling,” Historis : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 33–39, June 2021, doi: 10.31764/historis.v6i1.4075.

S. Ropiah, A. B. Rifa’i, and R. Aziz, “Implementasi Fungsi Perencanaan Yayasan Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat,” Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 171–188, 2019, doi: 10.15575/tadbir.v4i2.1787.

C. Aina, E. Baici, G. Casalone, and F. Pastore, “The Economics of University Dropouts and Delayed Graduation: A Survey,” SSRN Journal, 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3153385.

A. A. Agoro, “Instructional Strategies, Mathematical Ability, Mode of Entry, and Gender as Correlates of Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance in Integrated Science in Nigerian Colleges of Education,” JISTE, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2015.

H. Ihsan, “Validitas Isi Alat Uukur Penelitian: Konsep Dan Panduan Penilaiannya,” PEDAGOGIA Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 173, 2015, doi: 10.17509/pedagogia.v13i3.6004.

L. S. Asipi, U. Rosalina, and D. Nopiyadi, “The Analysis of Reading Habits Using Miles and Huberman Interactive Model to Empower Students’ Literacy at IPB Cirebon,” International Journal of Education and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 117–125, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.58557/ijeh.v2i3.98.

G. J. Hwang and S. Y. Wang, “Single loop or double loop learning: English vocabulary learning performance and behavior of students in situated comput-er games with different guiding strategies,” Computers and Education, vol. 102, pp. 188–201, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.005.

S. M. Brito, Active Learning: Beyond the Future. London: BoD – Books on Demand, 2019.

B. Jonsson, Y. C. Kulaksiz, and J. Lithner, “Creative and algorithmic mathe-matical reasoning: effects of transfer-appropriate processing and effortful struggle,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1206–1225, 2016, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2016.1192232.

T. Lowrie, T. Logan, and A. Ramful, “Visuospatial training improves elemen-tary students’ mathematics performance,” British Journal of Educational Psy-chology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 170–186, 2017, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12142.

D. Dumas, “Relational reasoning and divergent thinking: An examination of the threshold hypothesis with quantile regression,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 53, no. January, pp. 1–14, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.003.

B. Hanfstingl, G. Benke, and Y. Zhang, “Comparing variation theory with Piaget’s theory of cognitive development: more similarities than differ-ences?,” Educational Action Research, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 511–526, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2018.1564687.

S. Maharani, M. N. Kholid, L. N. Pradana, and T. Nusantara, “Problem Solving in the Context of Computational Thinking,” Infinity Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2019.

A. Septyawan, D. R. Soleh, and S. Ricahyono, “Publication Trends in Indone-sian Language Teaching: Focus on ‘Making Effective Sentences’ (2014-2023),” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 15, no. 4, 2023.