Innovative Learning Management in Improving Elementary School Students’ Literacy: A Case Study at SDN Rancaerang and SDN Pasirnagara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v7i1.1.801Keywords:
Elementary School, Innovative Learning, Learning Management, Reading Comprehension, Student LiteracyAbstract
Indonesian students read more than before, yet their reading comprehension remains low, a paradox that calls for systematic learning management rather than isolated literacy activities. This study describes and analyzes innovative learning management for improving student literacy at SDN Rancaerang in Sukabumi Regency and SDN Pasirnagara in Cianjur Regency, covering planning, organizing, implementation, evaluation, obstacles, and solutions. A qualitative multi-site case study collected data from fourteen informants through in-depth interviews, observation, and document study. The data were analyzed with the interactive model of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, and trustworthiness was established through source and technique triangulation, member checking, and an audit trail. Planning used the National Education Report as a diagnostic baseline for literacy-based modules. Organizing relied on Literacy Teams validated by principal decree and on grouping students by reading competency. Implementation combined Project-Based Learning and interactive reading corners, delivered through digital acceleration at Pasirnagara and local wisdom contextualization at Rancaerang. Evaluation used formative assessment and student portfolios. Constraints in infrastructure, human resources, and funding were addressed through material rotation, teacher capacity building, and the mobilization of external social capital. Both schools, however, set activity plans rather than comprehension indicators, which left the evaluation without a baseline. The study concludes that the managerial logic of literacy improvement is consistent across both sites while the delivery channel varies with geography and resources, and that the main remaining task is to define measurable comprehension targets at the planning stage.
Downloads
References
[1] Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia, Hasil Kajian Perpustakaan Indonesia Tahun 2024. Jakarta, Indonesia: Perpusnas RI, 2024.
[2] OECD, PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2023.
[3] G. R. Terry and L. W. Rue, Dasar-Dasar Manajemen, Rev. ed. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara, 2021.
[4] A. Asni, D. Dasalinda, and D. Chairunnisa, “Penerapan fungsi manajemen POAC (planning, organizing, actuating, and controlling) dalam layanan bimbingan dan konseling di sekolah,” Ideguru: J. Karya Ilm. Guru, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 357–364, 2023, doi: 10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.840.
[5] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1978.
[6] J. Piaget and B. Inhelder, The Psychology of the Child. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 1969.
[7] Republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta, Indonesia: State Secretariat, 2003.
[8] Ministry of Education and Culture, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 23 Tahun 2015 tentang Penumbuhan Budi Pekerti. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbud, 2015.
[9] D. U. Faizah et al., Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta, Indonesia: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Kemendikbud, 2016.
[10] S. B. Dito and H. Pujiastuti, “Dampak revolusi industri 4.0 pada sektor pendidikan: Kajian literatur mengenai digital learning pada pendidikan dasar dan menengah,” J. Sains dan Edukasi Sains, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 59–65, 2021, doi: 10.24246/juses.v4i2p59-65.
[11] S. Anwar and H. Umam, “Transformative education: Emphasizing 21st century skills and competencies in the independent learning curriculum,” AIM J. Islam. Educ. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.15575/aim.v1i1.28886.
[12] F. Isnaeni, S. A. Budiman, N. Nurjaya, and M. Mukhlisin, “Analysis of the readiness for implementing deep learning curriculum in madrasah from the perspective of educators,” Attadrib: J. Pendidik. Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2025, doi: 10.54069/attadrib.v8i1.841.
[13] S. Syahrani, I. Dacholfany, and S. Sudirman, “Implementasi supervisi klinis kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran guru SD,” POACE: J. Progr. Stud. Adm. Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.24127/poace.v4i1.4082.
[14] V. Symeonidis and J. F. Schwarz, “Phenomenon-based teaching and learning through the pedagogical lenses of phenomenology: The recent curriculum reform in Finland,” Forum Oświatowe, vol. 28, no. 2, 2016.
[15] I. Baguna et al., “Strategi peningkatan mutu pendidikan melalui literasi di madrasah,” J. Ilm. Multidisiplin Keilmuan Mandira Cendikia, vol. 2, no. 14, pp. 7–12, 2024.
[16] N. Sulastri, S. Anwar, U. Suherman, and E. S. Cipta, “Deep learning-based planning model for Islamic education in Indonesian integrated schools,” EDUKASIA J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 645–658, 2024, doi: 10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.1734.
[17] A. D. Firdaus, I. Suryadi, and S. Anwar, “Transformation and organizational resilience: PAI strategies in facing global challenges in the digital era,” J. Vision. Penelit. dan Pengemb. dibidang Adm. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 152–160, 2026.
[18] R. Riyanti, R. S. Sauri, and S. Anwar, “Transformation of student management in increasing student participation in non-academic activities,” Turots: J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 309–319, 2026, doi: 10.51468/jpi.v8i1.1131.
[19] R. K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2014.
[20] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018.
[21] Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: SAGE, 1985.
[22] L. Fathimah, M. Sofwan, I. P. Pratama, and S. Halimah, “Transformasi kurikulum Indonesia: Adaptasi kebijakan pendidikan di era globalisasi melalui Kurikulum Merdeka dan integrasi deep learning,” Tarbiatuna: J. Islam. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.47467/tarbiatuna.v5i2.8836.
[23] F. Prafitasari et al., “Training on Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) and Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) approaches for elementary school teachers,” Educate: J. Community Serv. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.32585/educate.v5i1.6660.
[24] C. A. Tomlinson, T. R. Moon, and M. B. Imbeau, Assessment and Student Success in a Differentiated Classroom. Alexandria, VA, USA: ASCD, 2013.
[25] U. Suherman et al., “Implementing a kindness-based leadership strategy in Islamic elementary education,” EDUKASIA J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 281–292, 2025, doi: 10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1384.
[26] S. H. S. Hayati and F. Fadriati, “Pendidikan karakter melalui projek penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila pada mata pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di sekolah dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3959–3969, 2023, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v7i6.6521.
[27] J. S. Sarong, “Exploring transformative leadership approaches in modern educational institutions,” Randwick Int. Educ. Linguist. Sci. J., vol. 4, no. 4, 2023, doi: 10.47175/rielsj.v4i4.845.
[28] D. F. Islamiyah, B. Prasetiya, and Z. H. Sain, “Transformative leadership in Islamic religious education at Raudhatul Athfal: Advancing competitive Islamic management in Probolinggo, Indonesia,” J. Islam. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 211–224, 2024, doi: 10.35719/jier.v5i3.438.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iceu Sugiawati, Lilis Suwandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
