PhET interactive simulation approach in teaching electricity and magnetism among science teacher education students


  • Marshall James P. Dantic President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines
  • Alyssa R. Fularon Governor Manuel D. Barretto National High School, Philippines



Phet smulation, electricity and magnetism, science teacher education


By boosting students' thinking and understanding of hard ideas, innovative teaching pedagogies help them better comprehend difficult subjects in Physics. This study aimed to assess the students’ conceptual knowledge in electricity and magnetism and their perspectives on the effects of the Phet Simulation Approach in teaching the said concepts. It utilized educational action research design with assessment-tests and a structured-interview guide as the main instruments in gathering the required data. There are 14 science teacher education students whose taking electricity and magnetism as their major subject served as participants. The assessment-test is composed of the traditional assessment test or multiple-choice test composed of 60 questions. The structured-interview guide contains one question, "What are the effects of Phet Simulation Approach in learning Electricity and Magnetism?” The results have revealed that the conceptual knowledge in Electricity and Magnetism improved to very satisfactory after the application of intervention. There is a significant difference in the assessment scores between pre-test and posttest. Six themes emerged from the students' perspectives on the effects of the intervention, including (a) better understanding; (b) learning through visualization; (c) learning became fun; (d) promotes self-facilitation of learning; (e) provides a broader range of options; and (f) grasping the micro-scale concepts. The study concludes that PhET Simulation Approach is an effective teaching strategy in electricity and magnetism. Further, the strategy is positively accepted by the students based on the qualitative data.


Download data is not yet available.


Aebersold, M. (2018) Simulation-based learning: No longer a novelty in undergraduate education. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(2), 1-1.

Aerts, D. (2014). Quantum theory and human perception of the macro-world. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 554.

American Chemical Society (2020) Importance of Hands-On Laboratory Science.

Balfour, J. and Khonle, A. (2016) Testing conceptual understanding in introductory astronomy. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, (6), 26-29.

Bao, L. and Koenig, K. (2019) Physics education research for 21 st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1-12.

Batuyong, C. and Antonio, V. (2018) Exploring the effect of PhET® interactive simulation-based activities on students’ performance and learning experiences in electromagnetism. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 121-131.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 11(4), 589-597.

Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., Romine, J. and Neiberding, M. (2018) Linking introductory astronomy students’ basic science knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, sources of information, and information literacy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010142.

Carpenter, Y., Moore, E. and Perkins, K. (2016) Using an interactive simulation to support development of expert practices for balancing chemical equations. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(6), 1150-1151.

Carpenter, Y., Perkins, K. and Loeblein, P. (2021) PhET Interactive Simulations for teaching and learning in Earth and Energy Sciences. Earth Educators’ Rendezvous.

Chang, W. (2008) Challenges encountered in implementing constructivist teaching in physics: A qualitative approach. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching (Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-16). The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science and Environmental Studies.

Chasteen, S. and Carpenter, Y. (2016) How do I use Phet Simulations in Physics Class. Physport.

Clement, J., Zietsman, A., Monaghan, J. (2005) Imagery in science learning in students and experts. In Visualization in science education (pp. 169-184). Springer, Dordrecht.

Dantic, M. J. (2021) Sci-Art: Visual art approach in Astronomy of teacher education students. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research & Development (AJMRD), 3(10), 12-19.

Elliott, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R., Littlefield Cook, J. & Travers, J. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College.

Freedman, R. (2000) Challenges in teaching and learning introductory physics. In from high-temperature superconductivity to microminiature refrigeration (pp. 313-322). Springer, Boston, MA.

Gaba, D. M. (2004). A brief history of mannequin-based simulation and application. Simulators in critical care and beyond, 7-14.

Garlick, J. (2014) Why everyone needs to understand science. In World Economic Forum Agenda.

Hou, M., Bliya, A., Hassouni, T. and Ibrahmi, E. M. (2021) The Effect of Using Computer Simulation on Students’ Performance in Teaching and Learning Physics: Are There Any Gender and Area Gaps?. Education Research International, 2021.

Lamina, O. (2019) Investigating the effects of PhET Interactive simulation-based activities on students’ learning involvement and performance on two-dimensional motion topic in Physics Grade 9. Scholar’s Press Publishing. https://doi. org/10.13140/RG, 2(29649.28006).

Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2019). Students’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism and its implications: A review. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 15(2), 55-67.

McLeod, S. (2019) Constructivism as a Theory for Teaching and Learning. Simply Psychology.

National Research Council (US) Chemical Sciences Roundtable (2012) Challenges in Characterizing Small Particles: Exploring Particles from the Nano- to Microscale: A Workshop Summary. National Academies Press.

Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J. & Ndayambaje, I. (2020) Effectiveness of PhET simulations and YouTube videos to improve the learning of optics in Rwandan secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 253-265. DOI: 10.1080/18117295.2020.1818042

Nkhoma, M., Calbeto, J., Sriratanaviriyakul, N., Muang, T., Ha Tran, Q. and Kim Cao, T. (2014) Towards an understanding of real-time continuous feedback from simulation games. Interactive Technology and Smart Education.

Pandolpho, B. (2018) Putting Students in Charge of their Learning. Edutopia.

Rogayan Jr., D. V., & Dantic, M. J. P. (2021). Backliners: Roles of science educators in the post-COVID Milieu. Aquademia, 5(2), ep21010.

Rutten, N. P. G., van Joolingen, W., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & education, 58(1), 136-153.

Salame, I. and Makki, J. (2021) Examining the Use of PhET Simulations on Students’ Attitudes and Learning in General Chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247.

Science Education Resource Center (2021) What is PHET? Pedagogy in Action. Carleton College.

University at Bufalo (n.d.) Simulations and Game-Based Learning. Center for Educational Innovation.

University of Colorado (2021) PHET Interactive Simulations.

Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., & Dimitrakopoulou, A. (2007). Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 111.

Wieman, C., Adams, W., Loeblein, P. & Perkins, K. (2010) Teaching physics using PhET simulations. The Physics Teacher, 48(4), 225-227. tps://


PlumX Metrics



How to Cite

Dantic, M. J. P., & Fluraon, A. . (2022). PhET interactive simulation approach in teaching electricity and magnetism among science teacher education students. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 2(2), 88-98.