Analysis of Geometry Units in the Mathematics Curriculum of Cambodia from the Perspective of Coherence

Authors

  • Veasna SIENG Graduate School for Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima city, 739-8529, Japan
  • Baba Takuya Graduate School for Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-5-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi Hiroshima city, 739-8529, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v5i1.335

Keywords:

Cambodia, curriculum coherence, general topic trace mapping, geometry

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the units in the Cambodian mathematics curriculum on geometry from the perspective of coherence. Four of the recently revised mathematics syllabi of primary and secondary education in Cambodia published in 2018, the latest version available during the research period of 2022-2023, have been collected. The document analysis following the procedure of General Topic Trace Mapping (GTTM) was used because it embraces curriculum coherence. The results of the analysis revealed that the Cambodian mathematics curriculum on geometry lacks coherence in terms of the four points: (1) the relations of the subdomains and contents are not well-organised and unnecessarily repetitive; (2) the contents and sub-contents are poorly ordered and are not age-appropriate, due to some contents are addressed as a prerequisite and other contents have a higher level than the student’s grade level; (3) the relations of some contents, sub-contents, and their learning outcomes are not clearly specified, as through a lack of logical or conceptual connections within and across years; and (4) the domains, sub-domains, contents, sub-contents, and learning outcomes are not clearly related nor sequenced. These four points indicate the importance and necessity of improving the coherence of geometry units in Cambodia’s mathematics curriculum. This analysis focused on the content relation aspect among three internal coherence aspects. Further research should be done on the two other aspects of internal coherence, structural and pedagogical, as well as external curriculum coherence. Analysis of all these aspects will contribute to the holistic improvement of the curriculum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

SEM, R. and k. HEM, Education Reform in Cambodia: Progress and Challenges in Basic Education, R.R. Paper, Editor. 2016: Parliamentary Institute of Cambodia. p. 24.

Naron, D.H.C., The Vision of Education Reform in Cambodia. 2015.

MoEYS, Cambodia's Education 2030 Roadmap, Sustainable Development-Goal4. 2019: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.

MoEYS, Education in Cambodia: Finding from Cambodia's experience in PISA for Development. 2018, Phnom Penh: Author.

UNICEF, Learning Loss in the Covid-19 Pandamic Era: Evidence from the 2016-2021 Grade Six National Learning Assessment in Cambodia. 2022: United Nations Childrent's Fund (UNICEF), Cambodia Country Office.

Bhatta, S.D., et al., Learning Loss in Cambodia and the Use of EdTech during COVID-19. 2022, Washington, DC: World Bank.

MoEYS, Technical Report: Grade 8 National Learning Assessment in Academic Year 2021 -2022. 2023, Phnom Penh: EQAD and MoEYS. 99.

MoEYS, Analysing Report on the G12 National Examination in the Year 2021 by Subjects (Khmer version). 2022: Phnom Penh.

Teodorović, J., Classroom and school factors related to student achievement: What works for students? School Effectiveness School Improvement, 2011. 22(2): p. 215-236.

Wang, T.H. and C.H. Kao, Investigating factors affecting student academic achievement in mathematics and science: cognitive style, self-regulated learning and working memory. Instructional Science, 2022. 50(5): p. 789-806.

Cuoco, A. and W. McCallum, Curricular Coherence in Mathematics. , in Mathematics Matters in Education, Y. Li, W. Lewis, and J. Madden, Editors. 2018, Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61434-2_13: Advanced in STEM Education.

Prawat, R.S. and W.H. Schmidt, Curriculum Coherence: Does the Logic Underlying the Organization of Subject Matter Matter?, in Contexts of Learning Mathematics and Science: Lesson Learn from TIMSS, S.J.H.a.T. Plomp, Editor. 2006, Routledge Taylor & Francies Group, London and New York. p. 291-302.

Schmidt, W.H., R. Houang, and L. Cogan, A coherent curriculum. American Education, 2002. 26(10): p. 1-18.

Oates, T., A Cambride approach to improve education international insightd to manage complexity. 2017: Univeristy of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. 40.

Schmidt, W.H. and R.S. Prawat, Curriculum coherence and national control of education: issue or non‐issue? Journal of curriculum studies, 2006. 38(6): p. 641-658.

Newmann, F.M., et al., Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational evaluation policy analysis, 2001. 23(4): p. 297-321.

Bateman, D., et al., Curriculum coherence and student success. 2015.

Wang, Z. and D. McDougall, Curriculum Matters: What We Teach and What Students Gain. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2018. 17(6): p. 1129-1149.

Reeves, C. and S. McAuliffe, Is curricular incoherence slowing down the pace of school mathematics in South Africa? A methodology for assessing coherence in the implemented curriculum and some implications for teacher education. Journal of Education, 2012. 53: p. 9- 36.

Confrey, J., et al., Scaffolding learner-centered curricular coherence using learning maps and diagnostic assessments designed around mathematics learning trajectories. ZDM Mathematics Education, 2017. 49: p. 717-734.

Watson, A. and M. Ohtani, Task design in mathematics education: An ICMI study 22. 2015: Springer Nature.

MoEYS, Detailed Mathematics Syllabus for Primary Education (Khmer version). 2018: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.

MoEYS, Detailed Mathematics Syllabus for Lower Secondary Education (Khmer version). 2018: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.

MoEYS, Detailed Mathematics Syllabus for Upper Secondary Education: Social Science track (Khmer version). 2018.

MoEYS, Detailed Mathematics Syllabus for Upper Secondary Education: Science track (Khmer version). 2018: Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport.

Schmidt, W.H., H.C. Wang, and C.C. McKnight, Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2005. 37(5): p. 525-559.

NIE, I. and P.R.I. PRI, Upper Secondary School Education Sector Development Project (USESDP-CS-02); Curriculum Review & Recommendation Report (Science, Math & ICT). 2021, NIE International Pte LTD, Panhchak Research Institute Co., Ltd.

MoEYS. Mathematics Syllabus_Primary One to Six_ Implementation Starting with 2021 Primary One Cohort.pdf>. 2021 [cited 2024 February 5]; Available from: https://www.moe.gov.sg/-/media/files/primary/2021-primary-mathematics-syllabus-p1-to-p6.pdf.

CDC, Mathematics syllabus (Grade 1-7). 2013: The Curriculum Development Centre P O Box 50092 Lusaka, Republic of Zambia.

MEXT, Elementary school teaching guide for the national course of study: Mathematics (Japanese Version). 2018, Osaka, Japan: Nihon Bunkyo Shuppan.

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

SIENG, V., & Baba Takuya. (2024). Analysis of Geometry Units in the Mathematics Curriculum of Cambodia from the Perspective of Coherence. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 5(1), 197-213. https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v5i1.335