Evaluation of the Pancasila Student Profile Strengthening Project Program at Public Middle Schools in Badung Regency

I Gusti Dian Ayu Purnamasari; Kadek Rihendra Dantes; I Made Yudana

doi:10.58905/jse.v5i2.517

Authors

I Gusti Dian Ayu Purnamasari Department of Administration Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
Kadek Rihendra Dantes Department of Administration Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia
I Made Yudana Department of Administration Education, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v5i2.517

Keywords:

Evaluation, Pancasila student profile, Project for Strengthening the Profile of Pancasila Students, CIPP

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Pancasila Student Profile Enhancement Project program at SMP Negeri Badung Regency, a case study of SMP Negeri 4 Abiansemal. This study is an evaluative study with a quantitative descriptive approach using the CIPP method (context, input, process and product). The population of this study was the P5 Project Team (Principal, School Treasurer and project implementing teachers) of class VIII totaling 18 people, and class VIII students of SMP Negeri 4 Abiansemal in the 2024-2025 academic year totaling 235 people. The research sample was a saturated sample for the project team totaling 18 people and 148 students determined by the simple random sampling method. The data collection techniques used were interviews to obtain initial information regarding the implementation of P5, questionnaires as the main data source, and observations to strengthen the results of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was compiled using a Likert scale (1-5). Data analysis was carried out on the CIPP variables using the direction of the T value of each variable to determine the effectiveness of the program. The results of this study are the effectiveness of the P5 program from the contact aspect obtained positive (+) or effective results. The input aspect obtained positive (+) or effective results, the process aspect obtained positive (+) or effective results, and the product aspect obtained negative (-) or ineffective results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Triwiyanto, Pengantar Pendidikan. Madiun: Bumi Aksara, 2021.

I. M. Sugiarta, I. B. P. Mardana, A. Adiarta, and W. Artanayasa, “Filsafat Pendidikan Ki Hajar Dewantara (Tokoh Timur),” JFI, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 124–136, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.23887/jfi.v2i3.22187.

M. Husnaini, E. Sarmiati, and S. M. Harimurti, “Pembelajaran Sosial Emosional: Tinjauan Filsafat Humanisme terhadap Kebahagiaan dalam Pembelajaran,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1026–1036, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.37985/jer.v5i2.887.

I. M. A. Giri, “Supervisi Pendidikan dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Sekolah,” J.PM, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 44, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.25078/jpm.v2i1.60.

D. L. Stufflebeam and G. Zhang, The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. New York: Guilford Publications, 2017.

D. L. Stufflebeam, “The CIPP Model for Evaluation,” in Evaluation Models: View-points on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, and T. Kellaghan, Eds., Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2000, pp. 279–317. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47559-6_16.

S. Aziz, M. Mahmood, and Z. Rehman, “Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 189–206, Jun. 2018.

K. A. Umam and I. Saripah, “Using the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Model in the Evaluation of Training Programs,” International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, vol. 2, p. 19, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.26086.

S. Yuliastuti, I. Ansori, and M. Fathurrahman, “Pelaksanaan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) Tema Kewirausahaan Kelas 4 SD Labschool UNNES Kota Se-marang,” Jurnal LEMBARAN ILMU KEPENDIDIKAN, vol. 51, no. 2, 2022.

T. Y. Utami and A. T. A. Hardini, “Evaluasi Program Kegiatan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) Fase B di SD Negeri Kalicacing 02 Salatiga,” Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 9, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.23969/jp.v9i2.14575.

A. Monalisa, “Implementasi Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila pada Sekolah Penggerak di SDN 198/1 Pasar Baru,” other, UNIVERSITAS JAMBI, Jambi, 2024. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://repository.unja.ac.id/

I. M. Wiratnyana, I. M. Yudana, and D. G. H. Divayana, “Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pro-gram Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter,” Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan Indonesia, vol. 11, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.23887/japi.v11i2.3427.

N. M. D. Pratiyaksi, I. W. Suja, and I. B. P. Arnyana, “Analisis peran modul ajar Kurikulum merdeka dalam penerapan profil Pancasila terhadap pembentukan karak-ter siswa SMP terkait Tri Hita Karana,” JPBPP, vol. 4, no. 12, p. 23, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.17977/um065.v4.i12.2024.23.

I. Muhammad, “Pengaruh Perkuliahan Daring Terhadap Kemandirian Belajar Maha-siswa Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Malikussaleh,” 1, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 24–30, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.32505/qalasadi.v4i1.1567.

H. Hasanah, “Teknik-Teknik Observasi (Sebuah Alternatif Metode Pengumpulan Data Kualitatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial),” At-Taqaddum, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 21–46, 2016, doi: 10.21580/at.v8i1.1163.