Exploring Linguistic Aesthetic in Bedhaya Senapaten Sukapratama Dance: A Stylistic-Semiotic Study

Authors

  • Galuh Lailani Aria Putri Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Sri Rochana Widyatutieningrum Institut Seni Indonesia Surakarta, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i1.593

Keywords:

Bedhaya Senapaten Sukapratama Dance, linguistic aesthetics, stylistic semiotics

Abstract

The Bedhaya Senapaten Sukapratama dance features several variations that remain firmly rooted in traditional symbolic structures while simultaneously opening space for new explorations in linguistic and aesthetic dimensions. This study aims to examine the aesthetic form Bedhaya Senapaten Sukapratama dance. The analysis of the dance’s aesthetic form employs an aesthetic approach to uncover its physical and formal elements. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews, and data validation. During the observation stage, the researcher directly observed the presentation of Bedhaya dance. Subsequently, interviews were conducted with dancers, art connoisseurs, and artists from the Mangkunegaran Palace. Lastly, data validation was performed through consultations with dancers, Mangkunegaran artists, cultural experts, linguists, community leaders, and local residents. The results of the study indicate that Bedhaya Senapaten Sukapratama dance is performed by seven male dancers wearing identical costumes and makeup, following the Bedhaya style of Mangkunegaran tradition. The structure of the dance consists of key elements including dancers, dance movements, spatial arrangements, musical accompaniment, title, theme, and floor patterns. The aesthetic concept of this dance adheres to the principles of wiraga, wirama, and wirasa, which are reflected in the Hasthasawandha concept—comprising pacak, pancat, luwes, irama, gending, ulat, lulut, and wiled. By analyzing this dance through a stylistic-semiotic and aesthetic framework, this research contributes to the enrichment of scholarly discourse in the fields of performing arts, cultural linguistics, and symbolic studies. Moreover, it offers a new perspective on how traditional artistic works can be rearticulated in contemporary contexts without losing their cultural essence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bantolo, M. W. 2(002). Alusan pada Tari Jawa. Tesis: Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakar-ta.

Clara, B.P. (1991). Seni Tari Jawa Tradisi Surakarta dan Peristilahannya. Alih Baha-sa. Mursabyo. Jakarta: ILDEP-RUL.

Daryono. (2019). Dimensi Estetis Tari Bedhaya Senapaten. Jurnal Seni Budaya, 17(2), 151-161.

Daulay, P., Muta’allim., Sayfullah, H., Rohmah, A., & Hafsah, H. (2024). Rebel Yell: Exploring Gender Resistance in Women’s Punk Subculture. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(1), 336- 400. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.10.1.9866.336- 400

Dewi, N. K. (1994). Tari Bedhaya Ketawang: Reaktualisasi Hubungan Mistis Panem-bahan Senopati dengan Kanjeng Ratu Kencana Sari dan Perkembangannya. Tesis: Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakaeta.

Djelantik, A.A.M. (1999). Estetika Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Masyarakat Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia.

Hadi, Y.S.( 2003). Aspek-aspek Dasar Koreografi Kelompok. Yogyakarta: ELKHAPI.

Hairus Salikin, Muta’allim, Fahmi Reza Alfani, Hosaini, & Hasan Sayfullah. (2021). Traditional Madurese Engagement Amids the Social Change of the Kangean Society. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 7(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.7.1.2633.32-42

Hera, D.B.F.X. (2021). Urip Iku Urub. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.

Koentjaraningrat. (1984). Kebudayaan Jawa. PN Balai Pustaka.

Lambangsari, S.P. (2023). Kepenarian Daryono dalam Tari Jawa Gaya Surakarta. Tesis: Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta.

Langer, S.K. (1988). Problematika Seni. Terj. F.X. Widaryanto. Akademi Seni Tari Indonesia.

Lokanantasari, R.P. (2016). Hubungan Ekspresi Penuangan Tari Bedhaya dengan Koreografi Bedhaya Sarpa Rodra Susunan Saryuni Padmaningsih. Tesis: Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta.

Maryono. (2015). Analisa Tari. Surakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia Press.

Md, S. (2016). Melihat Tari. Karanganyar: Citra Sain.

Muhammadiah, M., Muta’allim., Nawiruddin., Susanty, L., & Zarkasi. (2025). The Role of Linguistics on Influencing Community Associations on Social Media : A Socio-Semantic Study of Commodity Advertisements. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 11(1), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.11.1.11655.191-209

Murgiyanto, S. 2(016). Hidup Untuk Tari. Jakarta: Institut Kesenian Jakarta.

Muta’alim. (2022). Keanekaragaman Budaya, Bahasa, dan Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Indonesia. Edited by Muta’Allim, M. Penerbit: CV. Eureka Media Aksara.

Pamardi, S. (2017). Teroka Tari Gaya Surakarta. Surakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia Press

Prabowo, W. S. (1990). Bedhaya AnglirMendhung Monumen Perjuangan Mangkunegara I 1757-1988. Tesis: Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

_________. (2007). Sejarah Tari: Jejak Langkah Tari di Pura Mangkunegaran. Sura-karta: Institut Seni Indonesia Press.

Purwolelono, S. (2007). Garap Susunan Tari Tradisi Surakarta (Sebuah Studi Kasus Bedhaya Ela-Ela. Tesis: Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta.

Rahayu, N. (1994). Tari Bedhaya dalam Upacara Perkawinan Agung di Keraton Su-rakarta Masa Paku Buwana X 1893-1939. Tesis: Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakar-ta.

Rejono, D. D. (2020). Dimensi Estetis Tari Bedhaya Senapaten. Gelar: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 17(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.33153/glr.v17i2.2733

Rohidi, T.R. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian. CV. Cipta Prima Nusantara Semarang.

Rokhim, N. (2009). Rekonstruksi Tari Bedhaya Dirada Meta di Mangkunegaran. Tesis: Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta.

Sedyawati, E. (1981). Pertumbuhan Seni Pertunjukan. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Soedarsono, R.M. (1975). Elemen Dasar Komposisi Tari. Yogyakarta: Lagaligo.

______________. (1978). Pengantar dan Pengetahuan Komposisi Tari. Yogyakarta. Akademisi Seni Tari Indonesia.

Sri, P.N. (2007). Joget Tradisi Gaya Kasunanan Surakarta. Surakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia Press.

Sriyadi. (2013). Tari Tradisi Gaya Surakarta. Greget: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pencip-taan Tari, 12(2), 227-230.

Sunaryadi. (2013). Aksiologi Tari Bedhaya Kraton Yogyakarta. Jurnal Kawistara, 3(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.22146/kawistara.5221

Suryanti, Jefriyanto Saud, Azhariah Rachman, Muta'allim, & Amiruddin. (2023). Se-mantic Language Skills in 2-Year-Old Children: A Case Study of Universal Substantive Acquisition at Kampung Baru. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 9(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.9.2.7723.203-210

Widyastutieningrum, S.R. (2011). Sejarah Tari Gambyong: Seni Rakyat Menuju Ista-na. Surakarta: Institut Seni Indonesia Press.

Widyastutieningrum, S.R & Dwi, W. (2014). Pengantar Koreografi. Institut Seni Indo-nesia Press.

Yudistira, R., Rafiek, M., Herdiani, R., Saputra, M., Muta'allim, M., Irmani, I., & Asfar, D. A. (2024). A Bibliometric Analysis of Sociolinguistic Research in The Past Decade: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities. AIP Conf. Proc. 3065, 030026 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0225229

Zainal, A. G., Besar. I., Fitria, A., Rezeki, F., & Pratama, A. P. (2024). The Role of Hyperbolic Figures in Influencing Consumerson Social Media: A Stylistic Study on Shampoo Advertisements. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa,10(3), 729-742. DOI: http://10.55637/jr.10.3.10381.752-765

Downloads

PlumX Metrics

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

Galuh Lailani Aria Putri, & Sri Rochana Widyatutieningrum. (2025). Exploring Linguistic Aesthetic in Bedhaya Senapaten Sukapratama Dance: A Stylistic-Semiotic Study. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 6(1), 946-960. https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i1.593