Principal Academic Supervision Management in Improving the Pedagogic Competence of Vocational School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i1.1.625Keywords:
academic supervision, pedagogic competence, vocational school, instructional leadership, education managementAbstract
This study investigates the management of academic supervision by principals at SMKN 1 and SMKN 2 Leles, Cianjur Regency, in improving teachers’ pedagogic competence. Using a qualitative case study design, the research involved principals, vice principals, and vocational subject teachers as key informants. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis, and were analyzed using Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña’s interactive model. The findings indicate that supervision planning at both schools is supported by structured annual programs, standardized observation instruments based on pedagogic competence indicators, and participatory decision-making involving senior teachers and management teams. Implementation integrates clinical supervision techniques and reflective feedback to enhance lesson planning, classroom management, and assessment practices. Evaluation and follow-up mechanisms demonstrate progress toward evidence-based decision-making; however, the absence of standardized impact assessment tools limits the measurement of supervision outcomes on student learning. Supporting factors include leadership commitment, teacher motivation, and adequate facilities, while inhibiting factors involve limited training, inconsistent follow-up, and weak integration of supervision results into broader school development plans. The study concludes that effective academic supervision management in vocational schools should combine strategic planning, consistent implementation, data-driven evaluation, and sustainable follow-up, tailored to the unique characteristics of the vocational education context.
Downloads
References
T. Astoro, Y. Utanto, and N. Oktarina, “The Impact of Teacher Certification, Academic Supervision, and Teaching Facilities on Improving the Quality of Education with Learning Quality as an Intervening Variable in Vocational Schools around Grobogan Regency,” Int. J. Res. Rev., vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 127–136, 2023, doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20231017.
S. Rahmadhani and L. Suryati, “Vocational high school students’ competency needs to the world of work,” Mimb. Ilmu, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 349–355, 2022.
K. Permatasari, I. Rokhmawati, and E. Yayuk, “Comparative Analysis of The High School Double Track Program and Vocational Education: Implications for Graduates’ Work Readiness,” J. Vocat. Career Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2024.
N. Aminah, K. Kartono, and A. Rusilowati, “Pengaruh Supervisi Akademik Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru,” J. HURRIAH J. Eval. Pendidik. dan Penelit., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 28–42, 2022, doi: 10.56806/jh.v3i3.94.
R. Andarwati, N. Fajrie, and S. Surachmi, “Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah pada Kinerja Guru di SD Negeri Larangan Kabupaten Pati,” J. Educ., vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 5907–5916, 2023.
L. Sugiar, S. Sukirman, and S. Sanusi, “Academic Supervision as a Strategy for Improving Teaching and Learning Quality,” Int. J. Educ. Adm. Manag. Leadersh., pp. 31–48, 2024.
E. Julianda, I. Ismail, K. Khairuddin, and A. Lala, “Academic Supervision by School Principals: Enhancing Junior High School Teachers’ Professional Competence,” J. Educ. Manag. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024.
W. Warman, “Principal managerial competence and academic supervision on vocational teacher performance,” EduLine J. Educ. Learn. Innov., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 436–446, 2022.
Y. Sunaryo, “Academic Supervision of School Principals and Teacher Performance: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Pedagog. Soc. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 17–34, 2020.
D. Rohmadini, “Implementasi Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru (Studi Kasus di SMPN 1 dan SMPN 2 Cibeber Kabupaten Cianjur),” 2019.
S. Sakola, “SMKN 2 Leles Cianjur Dua Tahun Berturut-turut Melaksanakan UNBK,” Redaksi, 2019. .
J. W. Creswell and V. L. P. Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications, 2017.
Adrias and A. Ruswandi, Desain Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Mix Method. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2025.
R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications. SAGE Publications US., 2017.
M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.
A. Tashakkori and J. W. Creswell, “The new era of mixed methods,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2007, doi: 10.1177/2345678906293042.
Y. Lincoln and B. Guba, “Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Pulications.” Inc, 1985.
A. K. Shenton, “Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects,” Educ. Inf., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 63–75, 2004.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook, Third Edit. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.
P. Hallinger and R. H. Heck, “Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning,” Sch. Leadersh. Manag., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 95–110, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214.
R. DuFour and R. Eaker, Professional learning communities at work tm: best practices for enhancing students achievement. Solution Tree Press, 2009.
S. M. Hord, Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. Teachers College Press, 2004.
L. Darling-Hammond, “Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?,” Eur. J. Teach. Educ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 291–309, 2017.
K. S. Louis, K. Leithwood, K. L. Wahlstrom, and S. E. Anderson, “Investigating the links to improved student learning,” Wallace Found., pp. 2009–2023, 2010.
G. Biesta, M. Priestley, and S. Robinson, “The role of beliefs in teacher agency,” Teach. Teach., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 624–640, 2015.
W. E. Deming, Guide to Quality Control. Cambridge: Massachussetts Institute Of Technology, 1982.
E. Sallis, Total Quality Education in Education, Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan, Terj. Ahmad Ali Riyadi dan Fahrurrozi. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2010.
P. Hallinger and R. H. Heck, “Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement?,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 654–678, 2010.
C. D. Glickman, S. P. Gordon, and J. M. Ross-Gordon, Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach. ERIC, 2001.
V. M. J. Robinson, C. A. Lloyd, and K. J. Rowe, “The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types,” Educ. Adm. Q., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 635–674, 2008.
L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, “Effective teacher professional development.,” Learn. policy Inst., 2017.
B. J. Caldwell, School-based management, vol. 3. International Institute for Educational Planning Paris, 2005.
A. Cilek, A. Ç. Kılınç, O. Erdoğan, K. Arslan, and F. Sezgin, “Linking principal support and teacher resilience to teacher leadership in Türkiye: The mediating role of teacher work engagement,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., p. 17411432241308680, 2025.
P. Glewwe and K. Muralidharan, “Improving School Education Outcomes in Developing Countries,” 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmad Rival Anshori , Wiwik Dyah Andayani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.