Digital Literacy in Islamic Education: An Integrative Multidisciplinary Strategy to Counter Radicalism and Disinformation on Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i2.725Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Social Media, Islamic Education, Radicalism, DisinformationAbstract
The rapid expansion of digital information has created a paradox within contemporary Islamic education. On one hand, social media serves as an effective medium for da'wah; on the other, it has become a channel for disseminating radical ideologies and religious disinformation that threaten the sustainability of religious moderation in Indonesia. This study aims to describe an integrative multidisciplinary strategic model for countering radicalism and disinformation on social media. Employing a qualitative approach with a multiple case study design, data were collected through social media content analysis, in-depth interviews with Islamic education teachers, and participatory observations conducted in several pesantren across East Java. Thematic analysis was carried out with the assistance of qualitative data analysis software. The findings reveal five central components: the anatomy of digital radicalism and disinformation; the Framework of Islamic Learning and Technology for Ethical Reasoning; the integration of technological, narrative, and operational dimensions; the development and contextual validation of the FILTER prototype model; and the recontextualization of Islamic epistemology in the digital era. First, the vulnerability of young generations to radical content is shaped by weak critical thinking skills and fragmented religious understanding. Second, the integration of hadith studies, ushul fiqh, cognitive psychology, and digital communication proves effective in strengthening ideological resilience. Third, the FILTER model demonstrates its potential to enhance students’ ability to identify and reject problematic content during limited trials. Therefore, these findings affirm that multidisciplinary digital literacy strategies not only enhance learners’ technological competence but also reinforce ideological immunity against the growing waves of radicalism and disinformation. The implementation of the FILTER model further represents a new form of digital sanad an adaptive knowledge chain responsive to contemporary scholarly dynamics and technological developments.
Downloads
References
A. R. Mubarok, ‘Moderasi Beragama di Era Digital : Tantangan dan Peluang’, vol. 2, pp. 1–11, 2024.
S. H. I. Sholihul Huda and M. Fil, Dakwah Digital Muhammadiyah (Pola Baru Dakwah Era Disrupsi). Samudra Biru, 2022.
M. Tradisi and D. A. N. Modernitas, ‘PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DALAM ERA GLOBALISASI ’:, vol. 21, no. 2, 2024.
N. Adi et al., No Title.
P. I. Budaya, ‘1 , 2 , 3’, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 297–310, 2025.
O. Arya, F. Ibnu, and M. Si, ‘Membangun Inklusivitas Generasi Muda Muslim di Ruang Digital’, 2023.
A. Zuhri, ‘Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Era Globalisasi: Menyeimbangkan Tradisi dan Modernitas’, Tarbawi J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 21, no. 2, 2024.
Muta’allim, S. M. M. Wassalwa, S. Nuraini, Y. D. Agustin, and D. Wicaksi, ‘Pesantren As Agent of Wasathiyah on Responding the Problems of the Indonesian Community in the Society 5.0 Era (Case Study of Alumni Abuya Sayyid Muhammad Bin Alawi Al-Maliki)’, Iches, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023.
A. J. Mahardhani, N. Nawiruddin, J. Jalaluddin, J. Julhadi, and M. Muta’allim, ‘The Kyai’s Position in Rural Local Democracy Based on Patronage Politics at Tapal Kuda’, Muslim Herit., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 115–132, 2023, doi: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v8i1.6004.
A. Badrudin, A. Sofyan, H. Salikin, M. Mutaallim, and R. Wijaya, ‘Kyai and His Familys Criticism and Praise toward Santri at Pesantren’, Karsa, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 350–374, 2023, doi: 10.19105/karsa.v31i2.10940.
M. David and M. Pawley, ‘T HE U SE OF S YSTEMATIC S AMPLES by’, no. March, pp. 1–38, 2006.
A. Sariono, ‘Minority Language Maintenance : A Case Study of Mandaran Language in Kampung Mandar Village , Banyuwangi’, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 4067–4076, 2025.
Muta’allim, ‘Kh. Hasyim Muzadi’s Language Politeness Strategies in Responding The Different Perspective Between Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah: a Sociopragmatic Study’, Muslim Herit., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 54–77, 2025, doi: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.10951.
‘No Title’, 2023.
A. Saepurohman, M. Erihadiana, A. Sri Lestari, and A. Alai, ‘Strategic Management of Digital Literacy Initiatives in Islamic Boarding Schools of Tasikmalaya’, Munaddhomah, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 238–250, 2025, doi: 10.31538/munaddhomah.v6i2.1711.
F. Mahzumi, A. Aminuddin, H. Mahfudh, and M. M. Sm, ‘CYBER-ISLAMIC MODERATION IN INDONESIA: Digital Activism of Islami.co and IBTimes.id and Its Implications for Young Muslims’, Miqot J. Ilmu-ilmu Keislam., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 22–49, 2025, doi: 10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1290.
V. Braun, ‘No Title’, pp. 1–41.
A. Hamdan and A. Harraf, Business Development via AI and Digitalization, vol. 2.
K. N. Siregar, ‘Hamidah : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Pengembangan Model Literasi Hadis Digital untuk Generasi Z ’:, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 2025.
U. Hanifah, ‘Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan Kontemporer ( Konsep Integrasi Keilmuan di Universitas-Universitas Islam Indonesia ) Pendidikan Tinggi Islam dunia’, 1977, doi: 10.19105/tjpi.v13i2.1972.
S. Nabila, A. Putri, and M. E. Fadlullah, ‘Volume 03, Number 01 June 2022’, vol. 03, no. 01, 2022.
M. Einstein and R. Wagner, ‘Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority Marketing Religion in a Commercial Age’.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ainur Rohim; M. Yunus Abu Bakar, Ali Mas’ud

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







