Managing Mathematics Instruction through the PDCA Cycle: Applying the Demonstration Method to Improve Student Motivation

Lisna Sari; Iim Wasliman

doi:10.58905/jse.v7i1.762

Authors

Lisna Sari Nusantara Islamic University, Bandung, Indonesia
Iim Wasliman Nusantara Islamic University, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v7i1.762

Keywords:

demonstration method, mathematics learning, student learning motivation, PDCA cycle, elementary school

Abstract

This study is motivated by the problem of low student learning motivation in elementary mathematics instruction, which is often caused by the dominance of conventional, teacher-centered teaching methods. The demonstration method is considered a potential alternative to create more active and engaging learning experiences. This study aims to analyze the application of the demonstration method in mathematics learning to improve student learning motivation through the PDCA (Plan–Do–Check–Act) cycle at SD Negeri 2 Balewangi and SD Negeri 3 Karamatwangi in Garut Regency. The research employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving school principals, mathematics teachers, and students. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, while data trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation, member checking, and systematic documentation. The analytical framework was guided by G.R. Terry’s management theory and Deming’s PDCA cycle. The findings indicate that the demonstration method, when implemented through systematic planning, execution, evaluation, and follow-up actions, effectively increases student learning motivation and engagement in mathematics learning. Students became more active, confident, and enthusiastic in participating during lessons, and their conceptual understanding showed noticeable improvement. The study concludes that the PDCA-based application of the demonstration method provides an effective instructional management model for enhancing student motivation and improving the quality of elementary mathematics learning

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

O. Oljayevna and S. Shavkatovna, “The development of logical thinking of primary school students in mathematics,” Eur. J. Res. Reflect. Educ. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 235–239, 2020.

F. Sosa-Gutierrez, H. M. V. Apaza, S. V. Valdivia-Yábar, and W. W. Condori-Castillo, “Critical thinking and teaching mathematics: An analysis from education,” Int. J. Relig., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 387–405, 2023.

M. Jamil, T. B. Bokhari, and J. Iqbal, “Incorporation of critical thinking skills development: A case of mathematics curriculum for grades I-XII,” J. Asian Dev. Stud., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 375–382, 2024.

M. Vasuki, M. Celestin, and A. D. Kumar, “Curriculum design in mathematics: a review of effective frameworks and models,” Growth, vol. 2, no. 2, 2016.

B. C. Agbata et al., “Everyday uses of mathematics and the roles of a mathematics teacher,” Sci. World J., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 819–827, 2024.

D. K. Meyer, J. C. Turner, and C. A. Spencer, “Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning,” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 501–521, 1997.

J. C. Turner and D. K. Meyer, “A classroom perspective on the principle of moderate challenge in mathematics,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 311–318, 2004.

Y. Mzomwe, “Investigating students’ attitude towards learning mathematics,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., 2018.

R. Wakhata, S. Balimuttajjo, and V. Mutarutinya, “Relationship between students’ attitude towards, and performance in mathematics word problems,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 2, p. e0278593, 2024.

N. J. D. Alpacion, C. T. Camañan, A. J. L. Gregorio, J. M. R. Panlaan, and R. A. Tudy, “Attitude, self-efficacy and students’ academic performance in mathematics,” IAMURE Int. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–34, 2014.

P. VaraidzaiMakondo and D. Makondo, “Causes of poor academic performance in mathematics at ordinary level: A case of Mavuzani high school, Zimbabwe,” Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Invent., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2020.

L. Pretorius, “An altered flipped class pedagogy as intervention strategy to address passive learning in a teacher-centred classroom.” University of South Africa (South Africa), 2023.

W. E. Deming, Guide to Quality Control. Cambridge: Massachussetts Institute Of Technology, 1982.

W. E. Deming, “Principles for transformation,” Out Cris., vol. 18, p. 96, 1986.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth Edit. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc, 2018.

A. Tashakkori and J. W. Creswell, “The new era of mixed methods,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2007, doi: 10.1177/2345678906293042.

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications, 2014.

A. K. Shenton, “Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects,” Educ. Inf., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 63–75, 2004.

E. J. Tisdell, S. B. Merriam, and H. L. Stuckey-Peyrot, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons, 2025.

Y. Lincoln and B. Guba, “Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Pulications.” Inc, 1985.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook, Third Edit. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.

G. R. Terry, Principles Of Management. New York: Alexander Hamilton Institute, 1958.

D. H. Schunk, “Metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Research recommendations,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 463–467, 2008.

S. Samuel and H. Farrer, “Integrating the PDCA Cycle for Continuous Improvement and Academic Quality Enhancement in Higher Education.,” J. Comp. Int. High. Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 115–124, 2025.

J. Piaget, “The origins of intelligence in children,” Int. Univ., 1952.

E. Iyamuremye and D. Burns, “Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract instruction: enhancing students’ learning motivation and achievement in mathematics,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 2558303, 2025.

I. Purwadi, I. Sudiarta, and I. N. Suparta, “The Effect of Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract Strategy toward Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding and Mathematical Representation on Fractions.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1113–1126, 2019.

A. M. Boangmanalu and M. D. Nasution, “Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa SMP,” MAJU J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 10–16, 2023.

A. Pascarella et al., “An in–vivo validation of ESI methods with focal sources,” Neuroimage, vol. 277, p. 120219, 2023.

O. Hamalik, Manajemen Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2012.

Mulyasa, Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Rawamangun: PT Bumi Aksara, 2023.