Managing Learning Communities to Enhance Elementary Teacher Pedagogical Competence

Iwan Taryana; Hanafiah Hanafiah

doi:10.58905/jse.v6i2.2.664

Authors

Iwan Taryana Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung, Indonesia
Hanafiah Hanafiah Universitas Islam Nusantara, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58905/jse.v6i2.2.664

Keywords:

professional learning, pedagogical competence, school management

Abstract

Enhancing teacher pedagogical competence is a cornerstone of educational quality improvement. Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) have emerged as a strategic model for fostering collaborative, sustained professional development. However, their implementation is often inconsistent, limiting their impact on classroom practice. This study aims to analyze the management processes underpinning the implementation of PLCs designed to improve the pedagogical competence of elementary school teachers. This research employed a qualitative approach with a multiple case study design conducted at two Indonesian public elementary schools: SDN Rawasirna and SDN Selajambe 1. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with principals and teachers, non-participant observations of PLC activities, and analysis of institutional documents. The data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, involving cycles of data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the management of PLCs was highly contextual. Planning was participatory, grounded in teachers' self-identified needs. Organization differed, with one school adopting a formal structure and the other a more flexible, emergent model. PLC activities evolved from simple discussions to collaborative inquiry, including lesson study and student work analysis. Oversight mechanisms, including principal supervision and peer feedback, were established to ensure accountability and reflection. The effective management of PLCs significantly contributed to enhancing teacher pedagogical competence. Success was contingent on transformative instructional leadership, a strong collaborative culture, and adaptive management of challenges such as time constraints and varying facilitator skills. The study concludes that the efficacy of PLCs is determined not by their mere existence but by the deliberate management of their planning, organization, implementation, and oversight processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Anwar and H. Umam, ‘Transformative education: Emphasising 21st century skills and competencies in the independent learning curriculum’, AIM J. Islam. Educ. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.15575/aim.v1i1.28886.

L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute, 2017.

T. R. Guskey, ‘Professional development and teacher change’, Teach. Teach. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 381–391, 2002, doi: 10.1080/135406002100000561.

S. M. Hord, Learning Together, Leading Together: Changing Schools Through Professional Learning Communities. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2004.

R. DuFour, R. DuFour, R. Eaker, and T. Many, Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work, 3rd ed. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press, 2016.

E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932.

L. Stoll, R. Bolam, A. McMahon, M. Wallace, and S. Thomas, ‘Professional learning communities: A review of the literature’, J. Educ. Chang., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 221–258, 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8.

V. Vescio, D. Ross, and A. Adams, ‘A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning’, Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 80–91, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004.

M. Fullan, The new Meaning of Educational Change. London: Routledge, 2015.

U. Suherman et al., ‘Implementing a Kindness-Based Leadership Strategy in Islamic Elementary Education’, EDUKASIA J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 281–292, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1384.

N. Sulastri, S. Anwar, U. Suherman, and E. S. Cipta, ‘Deep Learning-Based Planning Model for Islamic Education in Indonesian Integrated Schools’, EDUKASIA J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 645–658, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i2.1734.

Supardi, ‘Pengembangan komunitas belajar guru sebagai strategi peningkatan mutu pembelajaran’, J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 205–214, 2013.

P. Hallinger, ‘Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research’, J. Educ. Adm., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 125–142, 2011, doi: 10.1108/09578231111116699.

G. R. Terry and L. W. Rue, Principles of Management. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1982.

K. R. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. New York: Sage Publications, 2018.

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2018.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. SAGE Publications, 2018.

S. P. Robbins and M. Coulter, Management, 14th ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education, 2018.

T. Bush, Theories of Educational Leadership and Management, 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2011.

A. Hargreaves and M. Fullan, Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2012.

W. E. Deming, Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

P. Senge, The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization. New York, NY: Doubleday, 2006.

J. P. Spillane, Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2006.